Cloud Storage
Wasabi Alternative
Wasabi vs Backblaze
Wasabi vs Backblaze: A 2025 Guide to Sovereign S3-Compatible Storage
Choosing a cloud storage provider involves navigating complex pricing and compliance challenges. Many IT leaders feel locked in by unpredictable egress fees and growing data sovereignty concerns.
Key Takeawys
True digital sovereignty is only possible with a 100% EU-owned and operated cloud provider, eliminating exposure to foreign laws like the US CLOUD Act.
Predictable cloud storage costs are achieved by selecting a provider with a transparent model that includes zero fees for egress or API calls.
Enterprise-grade S3 compatibility must include advanced features like Object Lock and an 'Always-Hot' architecture to ensure application stability and prevent hidden restore fees.
In 2025, selecting the right S3-compatible object storage is about more than just capacity and uptime; it demands a strategic focus on digital sovereignty, cost predictability, and architectural resilience. A strong majority of EU decision-makers now prioritize European solutions to ensure GDPR compliance and avoid CLOUD Act exposure. Yet, many feel trapped by complex pricing models that penalize data movement. This article provides a framework for evaluating storage partners on the criteria that matter most: full S3 API compatibility, a transparent economic model with zero egress fees, and an architecture built for EU-centric governance and ransomware protection.
Evaluating S3 Compatibility Beyond the Basics
True S3 compatibility protects your technology investments and eliminates migration risks for hundreds of applications. It requires support for advanced capabilities like versioning, object locking, and lifecycle management across any API, CLI, or SDK. Many providers offer only partial compatibility, creating instability for third-party backup and archiving tools. An enterprise-ready platform ensures your existing data pipelines continue to run without a single code rewrite.
A key differentiator is an “Always-Hot” object storage model, where all data is immediately accessible without tier-restore delays. This architecture reduces operational complexity by over 30% for many teams. It avoids fragile tiering policies that lead to API timeouts, restore failures, and hidden operational costs when urgent data access is required. This model guarantees consistent, predictable performance for any workload.
Achieving Predictable Costs by Eliminating Hidden Fees
The most significant challenge in cloud budgeting is unpredictable fees for data egress and API calls. Egress fees can constitute up to 15% of total cloud costs, surprising over 60% of IT leaders with budget overruns. A transparent pricing model eliminates these charges entirely, offering predictable expenses regardless of data movement. This approach is predictable by design, removing penalties for accessing your own data.
A truly predictable model includes three core commitments:
Zero egress fees for data retrieval.
Zero charges for API requests (GET, PUT, LIST).
No minimum storage duration policies.
This economic clarity allows Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to build services with defensible, stable margins. For enterprises, it means the freedom to execute a multi-cloud strategy without financial penalties, as detailed in our cloud pricing guide. This financial predictability is a cornerstone of a modern storage strategy.
Ensuring Digital Sovereignty and GDPR Compliance
Storing data within European borders is a primary selection criterion for over 70% of EU businesses. A sovereign-by-design provider operates exclusively in certified European data centers, offering country-level geofencing to meet strict GDPR requirements. This architecture ensures your data is governed solely by EU law, completely avoiding exposure to the US CLOUD Act. The CLOUD Act can compel U.S.-based companies to provide data to law enforcement, regardless of where it is stored.
Strict EU-centric data governance is the only guaranteed way to maintain digital sovereignty. This commitment provides the legal certainty required for regulated industries like financial services and healthcare. By choosing a European provider, organizations ensure their data remains protected under the EU's stringent privacy framework, a topic we explore further in our analysis of data security.
Building Resilient Architecture for Ransomware Protection
Modern security architecture must defend against ransomware, which is expected to impact 75% of organizations by 2025. Immutable storage with S3 Object Lock is the most effective defense, creating unchangeable, WORM (Write-Once-Read-Many) copies of your data. This feature makes it impossible for malicious actors to encrypt or delete your backups, guaranteeing a clean recovery point.
An effective ransomware defense strategy includes these elements:
Immutable Backups: Use S3 Object Lock to make critical data unalterable for a defined retention period.
Multi-Layer Encryption: Protect data with 256-bit AES encryption, both in transit and at rest.
Granular Access Control: Implement Identity and Access Management (IAM) with multi-factor authentication (MFA) and role-based access control (RBAC).
Resilient Infrastructure: Utilize an architecture with no single point of failure, ensuring high availability during a security event.
This approach, combined with a robust 3-2-1 backup strategy, provides a resilient posture against evolving cyber threats. You can learn more about this in our post on cloud storage strategies.
Preparing for the EU Data Act and NIS-2 Directive
Forthcoming EU regulations create new compliance obligations for 2025 and beyond. The EU Data Act, applicable from September 2025, mandates data portability and interoperability to prevent vendor lock-in. Providers must facilitate seamless data transfers, including all metadata and versions, within a 30-day window. This empowers customers with a guaranteed exit strategy, reinforcing their negotiating power.
Simultaneously, the NIS-2 Directive imposes stringent cybersecurity requirements on cloud providers, now classified as essential services. Compliance requires continuous security processes, documented supply-chain assurance, and timely incident reporting. Choosing a provider with baked-in compliance for these regulations gives your organization a competitive advantage. It turns a regulatory burden into a streamlined operational strength, a key theme in our compliance articles.
Enabling the Channel: Value for MSPs and Partners
For MSPs, resellers, and system integrators, predictable margins are paramount. A storage partner with zero egress or API fees allows partners to build profitable Backup-as-a-Service (BaaS) and archiving solutions. Fast onboarding and a partner-ready console with multi-tenant management, RBAC, and automation via API/CLI are essential for scaling operations efficiently. This focus on the channel is why we highlight strong partner programs.
Recent distribution agreements further expand local access for partners across Europe. The addition of api in Germany and Northamber plc in the UK demonstrates a growing ecosystem commitment. These partnerships provide resellers with localized support and streamlined procurement, simplifying the delivery of sovereign and compliant cloud storage solutions to their clients. This momentum helps partners capitalize on the rising demand for EU-based cloud services.
More Links
Wikipedia provides information about object storage, a data storage architecture that manages data as objects.
Europa.eu explains GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) rules for businesses dealing with customers in Europe.
Microsoft describes its Cloud Computing Compliance Controls Catalog (C5) offering in Germany.
CyrusOne discusses how GDPR has contributed to Germany's position as a key data center location.
InCountry introduces Germany's data residency laws for global companies.
DLA Piper provides information on data protection laws in Germany.
GDPRhub offers a compilation of information and resources related to data protection in Germany under GDPR.
Zoom details its compliance with the BSI C5 standard.
FAQ
What is digital sovereignty?
Digital sovereignty is the principle that data is subject to the laws and governance structures of the nation or region where it is located. For European businesses, this means storing data within the EU, under EU law (like GDPR), and with a provider not subject to foreign legislation such as the US CLOUD Act.
Why are egress fees a problem for cloud storage?
Egress fees are charges for moving data out of a cloud provider's network. They are often unpredictable and can add significant, unexpected costs, especially for use cases like disaster recovery, analytics, or migrating to another provider. This creates budget uncertainty and a form of vendor lock-in.
What does 'Always-Hot' storage mean?
An 'Always-Hot' storage model means all data is stored in a single, high-performance tier and is immediately accessible. This contrasts with tiered models (hot, cool, archive) that often involve delays and extra fees to restore data from colder tiers, adding complexity and unpredictable costs.
How does a European cloud provider help with CLOUD Act compliance?
By choosing a cloud storage provider that is owned, operated, and headquartered exclusively within the European Union, your data falls solely under EU jurisdiction. This provides a complete legal shield from the extraterritorial reach of the US CLOUD Act, which applies to US-based companies.
What should MSPs look for in a cloud storage partner?
MSPs should prioritize partners offering predictable pricing with no egress or API fees to ensure stable margins. Other key features include a multi-tenant management console, automation capabilities via API/CLI, robust security features like immutable storage, and strong local channel support.
Is full S3 API compatibility important for backup software?
Yes, it is critical. Leading backup and recovery software (e.g., from partners like NovaBackup) relies on the full S3 API feature set, including advanced functions like Object Lock for ransomware protection. Incomplete compatibility can lead to integration failures, unstable performance, and data protection gaps.
